MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is 36.4 mm wider, 6.3 mm taller, 4.4 mm deeper and 126 g heavier than the Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C. The Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C takes up 34 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C

Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C
Width × height × depth
102 × 92 × 84 mm (4.02 × 3.62 × 3.31 in)
Weight
620 g (21.9 oz)
Mount
Hasselblad X
Price
$7,399 at Adorama

All about the 907X & CFV 100C →

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Width × height × depth
138.4 × 98.3 × 88.4 mm (5.45 × 3.87 × 3.48 in)
Weight
746 g (26.3 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$3,999 at Adorama

All about the EOS R5 II →

Specifications compared

907X & CFV 100CEOS R5 II
SensorMedium format 43.8 x 32.9 mm (BSI CMOS)Full-Frame
Resolution100 MP45 MP (8192 x 5464)
StabilizationNoSensor-shift
ISO64–25,600100–51,200 (ext. 50–102,400)
Shutter speedMechanical (leaf, in lens) 1/4000 s · electronic 1/6000 s · up to 68 min1/8000–30 s mech. · 1/32000 electronic
AutofocusPhase detection, 294 points1053 phase-detection points
ViewfinderNone (tilting rear screen, optional grip/viewfinder)5.76M-dot OLED · 0.76x
Dimensions102 x 92 x 84 mm138.4 x 98.3 x 88.4 mm
Weight620 g body only670 g with battery & card · 588 g body
Burst3.3 fpsUp to 30 fps
VideoNoneDCI 8K up to 59.94 fps
Screen3.2" 2.36M-dot tilting touchArticulating 3.2" touchscreen + top status display
Card slotsInternal 1 TB SSD, 1x CFexpress BCFexpress Type B · SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLi-ion 3400 mAh, about 420 shots (CIPA)LP-E6P

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the 907X & CFV 100C Follow the EOS R5 II

More comparisons