MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R10 vs Sigma fp

The Sigma fp is 9.9 mm narrower, 17.9 mm shorter, 38.1 mm thinner and 7 g lighter than the Canon EOS R10. The Sigma fp takes up 60 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R10

Canon EOS R10
Width × height × depth
122.5 × 87.8 × 83.4 mm (4.82 × 3.46 × 3.28 in)
Weight
429 g (15.1 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
€897 at Foto-Lambertin

All about the EOS R10 →

Sigma fp

Sigma fp
Width × height × depth
112.6 × 69.9 × 45.3 mm (4.43 × 2.75 × 1.78 in)
Weight
422 g (14.9 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the fp →

Specifications compared

EOS R10fp
Resolution24.2 MP24.6 MP
SensorAPS-CFull-Frame
StabilizationDigital (Video Only)Digital
ISO100–32,000 (100–51,200 Extended)100–25,600 (6–102,400 Extended)
Shutter speed1/4000–30 s1/8000–30 s
BurstUp to 23 fpsUp to 18 fps
Video4K internal4K internal
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 2,360,000 Dot · 0.95xNone (optional LVF-11 loupe accessory)
ScreenFree-Angle Tilting 3" Touchscreen LCD3.15" 2.1M-dot fixed touch
Card slotsSingle Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)Single Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E17BP-51
Dimensions122.5 x 87.8 x 83.4 mm112.6 x 69.9 x 45.3 mm
Weight429 g with battery & card422 g with battery & card
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 651 zones, subject detection49-point contrast-detect AF, face/eye detection

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R10 Follow the fp

More comparisons