MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R10 vs Sigma fp L

The Sigma fp L is 9.9 mm narrower, 17.9 mm shorter and 38.1 mm thinner than the Canon EOS R10. The Sigma fp L takes up 60 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R10

Canon EOS R10
Width × height × depth
122.5 × 87.8 × 83.4 mm (4.82 × 3.46 × 3.28 in)
Weight
429 g (15.1 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$1,099 at Adorama

All about the EOS R10 →

Sigma fp L

Sigma fp L
Width × height × depth
112.6 × 69.9 × 45.3 mm (4.43 × 2.75 × 1.78 in)
Weight
427 g (15.1 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
$2,499 at Adorama

All about the fp L →

Specifications compared

EOS R10fp L
Resolution24.2 MP61 MP
SensorAPS-CFull-Frame
StabilizationDigital (Video Only)Digital (Video Only)
ISO100–32,000 (100–51,200 Extended)100–25,600 (6–102,400 Extended)
Shutter speed1/4000–30 s1/8000–30 s
BurstUp to 23 fpsUp to 10 fps
Video4K internal4K internal
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 2,360,000 Dot · 0.95xNone (optional EVF accessory)
ScreenFree-Angle Tilting 3" Touchscreen LCDFixed 3.1" Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsSingle Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)Single Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E17BP-51
Dimensions122.5 x 87.8 x 83.4 mm112.6 x 69.9 x 45.3 mm
Weight429 g with battery & card427 g with battery & card
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 651 zones, subject detection49-point hybrid AF, face/eye detection

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R10 Follow the fp L

More comparisons