MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R3 vs Fujifilm X-H2S

The Fujifilm X-H2S is 13.7 mm narrower, 49.7 mm shorter, 2.6 mm thinner and 436 g lighter than the Canon EOS R3. The Fujifilm X-H2S takes up 43 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R3

Canon EOS R3
Width × height × depth
150 × 142.6 × 87.2 mm (5.91 × 5.61 × 3.43 in)
Weight
1,015 g (35.8 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
no recent price

All about the EOS R3 →

Fujifilm X-H2S

Fujifilm X-H2S
Width × height × depth
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm (5.37 × 3.66 × 3.33 in)
Weight
579 g (20.4 oz)
Mount
Fujifilm X
Price
no recent price

All about the X-H2S →

Specifications compared

EOS R3X-H2S
Resolution24.1 MP26.16 MP (6240 x 4160)
SensorFull-FrameAPS-C (stacked)
StabilizationSensor-ShiftSensor-shift
ISO100–102,400 (50–204,800 Extended)160–12,800 (ext. 80–51,200)
Shutter speed1/64000–30 s1/8000–15 min mech. · 1/32000 electronic
BurstUp to 30 fpsUp to 40 fps
Video6K internal6.2K up to 29.97 fps
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 5,760,000 Dot · 0.76x5.76M-dot OLED · 0.8x
ScreenArticulating 3.2" Touchscreen LCDVari-angle 3" touchscreen · top status LCD
Card slotsCFexpress Type B · SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)CFexpress Type B · SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E19NP-W235
Dimensions150 x 142.6 x 87.2 mm136.3 x 92.9 x 84.6 mm
Weight1015 g with battery & card579 g body only
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detection, Eye Control425 phase-detection points

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R3 Follow the X-H2S

More comparisons