MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R5 C vs Leica Q3 43

The Leica Q3 43 is 12.2 mm narrower, 21.3 mm shorter and 14.2 mm thinner than the Canon EOS R5 C. The Leica Q3 43 takes up 37 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R5 C

Canon EOS R5 C
Width × height × depth
142.2 × 101.6 × 111.8 mm (5.60 × 4.00 × 4.40 in)
Weight
770 g (27.2 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$2,999 at B&H Photo

All about the EOS R5 C →

Leica Q3 43

Leica Q3 43
Width × height × depth
130 × 80.3 × 97.6 mm (5.12 × 3.16 × 3.84 in)
Weight
772 g (27.2 oz)
Mount
Fixed lens
Price
$7,950 at Adorama

All about the Q3 43 →

Specifications compared

EOS R5 CQ3 43
Resolution45 MP60 MP
SensorFull-FrameFull-frame BSI CMOS
StabilizationDigitalOptical (lens)
ISOPhoto50–100000
Shutter speed1/8000–30 s1/2000–120 s (electronic 1/16000)
BurstUp to 20 fps15 fps (12-bit), 7 fps with AF (14-bit)
Video8K internal8K 30p 10-bit, 4K 60p 10-bit 4:2:2
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 5,790,000 Dot · 0.76x5.76M-dot EVF, 0.79x
ScreenFree-Angle Tilting 3.2" Touchscreen LCD3.0" 1.84M-dot tilting touch
Card slotsCFexpress Type B · SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)1x SD UHS-II
BatteryLP-E6NHBP-SCL6, about 350 shots (CIPA)
Dimensions142.2 x 101.6 x 111.8 mm130 x 80.3 x 97.6 mm
Weight770 g with battery & card772 g
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detectionHybrid AF (PDAF/contrast/depth map), 315 fields, subject detection
Lens–43mm F2 (35mm equivalent), built in

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R5 C Follow the Q3 43

More comparisons