MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Hasselblad X2D 100C

The Hasselblad X2D 100C is 10.1 mm wider, 7.7 mm taller, 13.9 mm thinner and 149 g heavier than the Canon EOS R5 Mark II.

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Width × height × depth
138.4 × 98.3 × 88.4 mm (5.45 × 3.87 × 3.48 in)
Weight
746 g (26.3 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$3,999 at Adorama

All about the EOS R5 II →

Hasselblad X2D 100C

Hasselblad X2D 100C
Width × height × depth
148.5 × 106 × 74.5 mm (5.85 × 4.17 × 2.93 in)
Weight
895 g (31.6 oz)
Mount
Hasselblad X
Price
$5,739 at B&H Photo

All about the Hasselblad X2D 100C →

Specifications compared

EOS R5 IIHasselblad X2D 100C
SensorFull-Frame100 MP medium format (43.8 x 32.9 mm)
Resolution45 MP (8192 x 5464)100 MP
StabilizationSensor-shift5-axis in-body, up to 7 stops
ISO100–51,200 (ext. 50–102,400)64–25600
Shutter speed1/8000–30 s mech. · 1/32000 electronic1/4000–68 min (electronic 1/6000)
BurstUp to 30 fps3.3 fps
VideoDCI 8K up to 59.94 fpsNone
Autofocus1053 phase-detection pointsHybrid PDAF/contrast AF, 294 zones
Viewfinder5.76M-dot OLED · 0.76x5.76M-dot OLED, 1.0x
ScreenArticulating 3.2" touchscreen + top status display3.6" 2.36M-dot tilting touch
Card slotsCFexpress Type B · SDXC (UHS-II)Internal 1 TB SSD, 1x CFexpress B
BatteryLP-E6PLi-ion 3400 mAh, about 420 shots (CIPA)
Dimensions138.4 x 98.3 x 88.4 mm148.5 x 106 x 74.5 mm
Weight670 g with battery & card · 588 g body895 g (with battery)
Size (W x H x D)–148.5 x 106 x 74.5 mm

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R5 II Follow the Hasselblad X2D 100C

More comparisons