MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is 16.7 mm narrower, 14 mm shorter, 39.4 mm thinner and 205 g lighter than the Canon EOS R6 Mark II. The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV takes up 58 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Width × height × depth
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm (5.45 × 3.87 × 3.48 in)
Weight
588 g (20.7 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$1,999 at Adorama

All about the EOS R6 II →

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Width × height × depth
121.7 × 84.4 × 49 mm (4.79 × 3.32 × 1.93 in)
Weight
383 g (13.5 oz)
Mount
Micro Four Thirds
Price
$800 at B&H Photo

All about the OM-D E-M10 IV →

Specifications compared

EOS R6 IIOM-D E-M10 IV
Resolution24.2 MP20.3 MP
SensorFull-FrameFour Thirds
StabilizationSensor-ShiftSensor-Shift
ISO100–102,400 (50–204,800 Extended)200–25,600 (100–25,600 Extended)
Shutter speed1/16000–30 s1/16000–60 s
BurstUp to 40 fpsUp to 15 fps
Video4K internal4K internal
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 3,690,000 Dot · 0.76xElectronic (OLED) · 2,360,000 Dot · 0.67x
ScreenArticulating 3" Touchscreen LCD180° Tilting 3" Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsDual Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)Single Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E6NHBLS-50
Dimensions138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4 mm121.7 x 84.4 x 49 mm
Weight588 g body only383 g with battery & card
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detection121-point contrast-detect AF, face/eye detection

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R6 II Follow the OM-D E-M10 IV

More comparisons