MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Fujifilm X-H2S

The Fujifilm X-H2S is 2.1 mm narrower, 5.5 mm shorter, 3.8 mm thinner and 120 g lighter than the Canon EOS R6 Mark III. The Fujifilm X-H2S takes up 11 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R6 Mark III

Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Width × height × depth
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm (5.45 × 3.87 × 3.48 in)
Weight
699 g (24.7 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$2,599 at Adorama

All about the EOS R6 III →

Fujifilm X-H2S

Fujifilm X-H2S
Width × height × depth
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm (5.37 × 3.66 × 3.33 in)
Weight
579 g (20.4 oz)
Mount
Fujifilm X
Price
$2,899 at Adorama

All about the X-H2S →

Specifications compared

EOS R6 IIIX-H2S
Resolution32.5 MP26.16 MP (6240 x 4160)
SensorFull-FrameAPS-C (stacked)
StabilizationSensor-ShiftSensor-shift
ISOPhoto160–12,800 (ext. 80–51,200)
Shutter speed1/16000–30 s1/8000–15 min mech. · 1/32000 electronic
BurstUp to 40 fpsUp to 40 fps
Video6K internal6.2K up to 29.97 fps
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 3,686,400 Dot · 0.76x5.76M-dot OLED · 0.8x
ScreenArticulating 3" Touchscreen LCDVari-angle 3" touchscreen · top status LCD
Card slotsCFexpress Type B · SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)CFexpress Type B · SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E6PNP-W235
Dimensions138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4 mm136.3 x 92.9 x 84.6 mm
Weight699 g with battery & card579 g body only
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detection425 phase-detection points

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R6 III Follow the X-H2S

More comparisons