MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R6 Mark III vs Fujifilm X-S20

The Fujifilm X-S20 is 10.7 mm narrower, 13.3 mm shorter, 23 mm thinner and 289 g lighter than the Canon EOS R6 Mark III. The Fujifilm X-S20 takes up 41 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R6 Mark III

Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Width × height × depth
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm (5.45 × 3.87 × 3.48 in)
Weight
699 g (24.7 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
$2,599 at Adorama

All about the EOS R6 III →

Fujifilm X-S20

Fujifilm X-S20
Width × height × depth
127.7 × 85.1 × 65.4 mm (5.03 × 3.35 × 2.57 in)
Weight
410 g (14.5 oz)
Mount
Fujifilm X
Price
$1,499 at Adorama

All about the X-S20 →

Specifications compared

EOS R6 IIIX-S20
Resolution32.5 MP26.1 MP (6240 x 4160)
SensorFull-FrameAPS-C
StabilizationSensor-ShiftSensor-shift
ISOPhoto160–12,800 (ext. 80–51,200)
Shutter speed1/16000–30 s1/4000–15 min mech. · 1/32000 electronic
BurstUp to 40 fpsUp to 20 fps
Video6K internal6.2K up to 29.97 fps
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 3,686,400 Dot · 0.76x2.36M-dot OLED · 0.62x
ScreenArticulating 3" Touchscreen LCDVari-angle 3" touchscreen
Card slotsCFexpress Type B · SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)Single SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E6PNP-W235
Dimensions138.4 x 98.4 x 88.4 mm127.7 x 85.1 x 65.4 mm
Weight699 g with battery & card410 g body only
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detection117 phase-detection points

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R6 III Follow the X-S20

More comparisons