MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R8 vs Sigma BF

The Sigma BF is 2.5 mm narrower, 13.3 mm shorter, 33.3 mm thinner and 15 g lighter than the Canon EOS R8. The Sigma BF takes up 56 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R8

Canon EOS R8
Width × height × depth
132.6 × 86.1 × 70.1 mm (5.22 × 3.39 × 2.76 in)
Weight
461 g (16.3 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
no recent price

All about the EOS R8 →

Sigma BF

Sigma BF
Width × height × depth
130.1 × 72.8 × 36.8 mm (5.12 × 2.87 × 1.45 in)
Weight
446 g (15.7 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the BF →

Specifications compared

EOS R8BF
Resolution24.2 MP24.6 MP
SensorFull-FrameFull-Frame
StabilizationDigitalDigital (Video Only)
ISO100–102,400 (50–204,800 Extended)100–102,400
Shutter speed1/16000–30 s1/25600–30 s
BurstUp to 40 fpsUp to 8 fps
Video4K internal6K internal
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 2,360,000 Dot · 0.7xNone
ScreenArticulating 3" Touchscreen LCDFixed 3.1" Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsSingle Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)No
BatteryLP-E17BP-81
Dimensions132.59 x 86.11 x 70.1 mm130.1 x 72.8 x 36.8 mm
Weight461 g with battery & card446 g with battery & card
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detectionHybrid AF (phase + contrast), human/animal detection

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R8 Follow the BF

More comparisons