MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Canon EOS R8 vs Sigma FP2

The Sigma FP2 is 20.6 mm narrower, 15.1 mm shorter and 29.1 mm thinner than the Canon EOS R8. The Sigma FP2 takes up 59 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Canon EOS R8

Canon EOS R8
Width × height × depth
132.6 × 86.1 × 70.1 mm (5.22 × 3.39 × 2.76 in)
Weight
461 g (16.3 oz)
Mount
Canon RF
Price
no recent price

All about the EOS R8 →

Sigma FP2

Sigma FP2
Width × height × depth
112 × 71 × 41 mm (4.41 × 2.80 × 1.61 in)
Weight
460 g (16.2 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the FP2 →

Specifications compared

EOS R8FP2
Resolution24.2 MP24.5 MP
SensorFull-FrameFull-Frame
StabilizationDigitalDigital (Video Only)
ISO100–102,400 (50–204,800 Extended)Photo
Shutter speed1/16000–30 s1/25600–30 s
BurstUp to 40 fpsUp to 20 fps
Video4K internal6K internal
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 2,360,000 Dot · 0.7xNone (optional EVF accessory)
ScreenArticulating 3" Touchscreen LCDTilting Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsSingle Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)Single Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryLP-E17BP-91
Dimensions132.59 x 86.11 x 70.1 mm112 x 71 x 41 mm
Weight461 g with battery & card460 g with battery & card
AutofocusDual Pixel CMOS AF II, 1053 zones, subject detectionHybrid phase/contrast AF, subject detection

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the EOS R8 Follow the FP2

More comparisons