MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Leica SL3 vs Hasselblad X2D II 100C

The Hasselblad X2D II 100C is 7.3 mm wider, 2 mm shorter, 9.6 mm thinner and 71 g heavier than the Leica SL3. The Hasselblad X2D II 100C takes up 8 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Leica SL3

Leica SL3
Width × height × depth
141.2 × 108 × 84.6 mm (5.56 × 4.25 × 3.33 in)
Weight
769 g (27.1 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the SL3 →

Hasselblad X2D II 100C

Hasselblad X2D II 100C
Width × height × depth
148.5 × 106 × 75 mm (5.85 × 4.17 × 2.95 in)
Weight
840 g (29.6 oz)
Mount
Hasselblad X
Price
no recent price

All about the X2D II 100C →

Specifications compared

SL3X2D II 100C
Resolution60.3 MP100 MP (11,656 x 8742)
SensorFull-Frame CMOSMedium format 43.8 x 32.9 mm (BSI CMOS)
StabilizationSensor-ShiftSensor-shift
ISONative in Manual Mode: 50–100,00050–25,600
Shutter speed1/16000–60 sMechanical (leaf, in lens) 1/4000 s · electronic 1/6000 s · up to 68 min
BurstUp to 15 fps3 fps
Video8K internalNone
ViewfinderElectronic (OLED) · 5,760,000 Dot · 0.76x5.76M-dot Micro-OLED, 1.0x
ScreenTilting 3.2" Touchscreen LED3.6" 2.36M-dot tilting OLED touch
Card slotsCFexpress Type B · SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)Internal 1 TB SSD, 1x CFexpress B
BatteryBP-SCL6Li-ion 3400 mAh, about 327 shots (CIPA)
Dimensions141.2 x 108 x 84.6 mm148.5 x 106 x 75 mm
Weight769 g body only840 g with battery
AutofocusHybrid AF (phase, contrast, depth mapping), subject detectionPhase detection, 425 points

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the SL3 Follow the X2D II 100C

More comparisons