MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Sigma BF vs Sigma fp L

The Sigma fp L is 17.5 mm narrower, 2.9 mm shorter, 8.5 mm deeper and 19 g lighter than the Sigma BF.

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Sigma BF

Sigma BF
Width × height × depth
130.1 × 72.8 × 36.8 mm (5.12 × 2.87 × 1.45 in)
Weight
446 g (15.7 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the BF →

Sigma fp L

Sigma fp L
Width × height × depth
112.6 × 69.9 × 45.3 mm (4.43 × 2.75 × 1.78 in)
Weight
427 g (15.1 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the fp L →

Specifications compared

BFfp L
Resolution24.6 MP61 MP
SensorFull-FrameFull-Frame
StabilizationDigital (Video Only)Digital (Video Only)
ISO100–102,400100–25,600 (6–102,400 Extended)
Shutter speed1/25600–30 s1/8000–30 s
BurstUp to 8 fpsUp to 10 fps
Video6K internal4K internal
ScreenFixed 3.1" Touchscreen LCDFixed 3.1" Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsNoSingle Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryBP-81BP-51
Dimensions130.1 x 72.8 x 36.8 mm112.6 x 69.9 x 45.3 mm
Weight446 g with battery & card427 g with battery & card
AutofocusHybrid AF (phase + contrast), human/animal detection49-point hybrid AF, face/eye detection
ViewfinderNoneNone (optional EVF accessory)

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the BF Follow the fp L

More comparisons