MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Sigma BF vs Sigma FP2

The Sigma FP2 is 18.1 mm narrower, 1.8 mm shorter, 4.2 mm deeper and 14 g heavier than the Sigma BF. The Sigma FP2 takes up 6 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Sigma BF

Sigma BF
Width × height × depth
130.1 × 72.8 × 36.8 mm (5.12 × 2.87 × 1.45 in)
Weight
446 g (15.7 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the BF →

Sigma FP2

Sigma FP2
Width × height × depth
112 × 71 × 41 mm (4.41 × 2.80 × 1.61 in)
Weight
460 g (16.2 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
no recent price

All about the FP2 →

Specifications compared

BFFP2
Resolution24.6 MP24.5 MP
SensorFull-FrameFull-Frame
StabilizationDigital (Video Only)Digital (Video Only)
ISO100–102,400Photo
Shutter speed1/25600–30 s1/25600–30 s
BurstUp to 8 fpsUp to 20 fps
Video6K internal6K internal
ScreenFixed 3.1" Touchscreen LCDTilting Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsNoSingle Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)
BatteryBP-81BP-91
Dimensions130.1 x 72.8 x 36.8 mm112 x 71 x 41 mm
Weight446 g with battery & card460 g with battery & card
AutofocusHybrid AF (phase + contrast), human/animal detectionHybrid phase/contrast AF, subject detection
ViewfinderNoneNone (optional EVF accessory)

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the BF Follow the FP2

More comparisons