MirrorlessWorld.com

3D comparison › Cameras compared

Sigma BF vs Nikon Zf

The Nikon Zf is 13.9 mm wider, 30.2 mm taller, 12.2 mm deeper and 264 g heavier than the Sigma BF. The Sigma BF takes up 52 % less space (the box around the body, without lens).

See them side by side at real size
In 3D, from every angle, with the lens of your choice.
Open the 3D comparison →

Sigma BF

Sigma BF
Width × height × depth
130.1 × 72.8 × 36.8 mm (5.12 × 2.87 × 1.45 in)
Weight
446 g (15.7 oz)
Mount
L-Mount
Price
$2,199 at Adorama

All about the BF →

Nikon Zf

Nikon Zf
Width × height × depth
144 × 103 × 49 mm (5.67 × 4.06 × 1.93 in)
Weight
710 g (25.0 oz)
Mount
Nikon Z
Price
$1,997 at Adorama

All about the Zf →

Specifications compared

BFZf
Resolution24.6 MP24.5 MP
SensorFull-FrameFull-Frame
StabilizationDigital (Video Only)Sensor-Shift
ISO100–102,400Photo
Shutter speed1/25600–30 s1/8000–30 s
BurstUp to 8 fpsUp to 14 fps
Video6K internal4K internal
ScreenFixed 3.1" Touchscreen LCDArticulating 3.2" Touchscreen LCD
Card slotsNoSD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) · microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC (UHS-I)
BatteryBP-81EN-EL15c
Dimensions130.1 x 72.8 x 36.8 mm144 x 103 x 49 mm
Weight446 g with battery & card710 g with battery & card
AutofocusHybrid AF (phase + contrast), human/animal detection273-point hybrid AF, subject detection
ViewfinderNoneElectronic (OLED) · 3,690,000 Dot · 0.8x

Values that differ are in bold. From the makers' published specifications.

Can't decide?

Follow both prices and get an e-mail when one drops. Already own one? Tell us, and we e-mail you its firmware updates and news.

Follow the BF Follow the Zf

More comparisons